Basquiat and Haring: A Hurried Generation By Glenn O'Brien Keith Haring’s career ended with his death at 31; Jean-Michel Basquiat’s career ended with his death at 27. They were the most powerful artists of their generation and both produced a life’s work in little more than a decade. Their intensity seemed fated, as if they knew they had only a few years to change the world. I met Basquiat when he was 18 years old and best known as the author of SAMO, the cryptic and clever graffiti that suddenly popped up around Manhattan, particularly in the art districts of SoHo and the East Village. Here was a guy doing something really different. This wasn’t just a tag, a turf-signifying signature, this was comedic poetry, post-Zen koans and aphorisms of teenage prophesy. After a few weeks of hanging out, I also discovered that the guy was a real artist. Watching him draw was like watching Willie Mays bat or Dr. J dunk. It was no coincidence that he wasn’t tagging stations on the 6 train, but instead concentrating on Mercer, Greene, Wooster and West Broadway streets. He wasn’t about going to the Bronx but about going to the top. One day, I guess it was 1980, I asked Basquiat who his favorite artist was and he said Haring. I had no idea who that was, but instead of explaining, he just brought him around to my weekly cable TV show, “TV Party.” I couldn’t have been more surprised. It would have been hard to find someone who looked more the part of an innocent. He had a sweet, open, angelic baby face, curly already-receding hair, and he wore bright pink plastic glasses. He looked like someone Woody Allen might have cast to play a teen Woody, nerdy but also somehow blank and almost defiant. He was two and a half years older than Basquiat, but he looked even younger. Later I figured out that this kid was the one who was wheat-pasting provocatively funny collage posters up around the rock clubs, satires of The Daily News and New York Post headlines like: “Reagan Slain by Hero Cop” and “Mob Flees at Pope Rally.” At around the same time, Richard Hambleton was doing police-style chalk outlines on sidewalks covering the same turf. Apparently Haring first met Basquiat by accident at the School of Visual Arts, where Haring was a student. In an interview with Vince Aletti, Haring recalled: “SVA was where I met Kenny Scharf, where I met John Sex; it’s actually where I met SAMO for the first time. I let him into the school without knowing who he was—because he was having trouble getting past the security guard at the front—and he asked me if I’d walk him into the school, so I walked him in, and then later on I saw all this graffiti and found out he was the one who had done it.” That generation of New York artists—Basquiat, Haring, Scharf, Lenny McGurr aka “Futura 2000,” and Hambleton, as well as somewhat older artists like John Fekner—was certainly inspired by the graffiti scene, but what they were doing was more like unauthorized public art. It wasn’t simply about marking out territory, about individuals saying “I’m here” in a world of corporate signs; it was about making art for the great audience, the people on the streets, art that wasn’t a monument to a war hero, or an abstract sculpture funded by a bank, but post-Pop popular art. It often had a message and a political dimension, like the May ’68 posters of Atelier Populaire, but first of all it was art. Hambleton’s anthropomorphic black shadows were painted on walls along streets that were still dangerous, and they could throw a chill up the spine as you turned a corner. Haring’s subway chalk drawings provided a noncommercial, populist form of delight for MTA riders. While Basquiat quit working outside with a bang, writing “SAMO IS DEAD,” Haring continued making his subway drawings into 1985 when he had been represented by the Tony Shafrazi Gallery for three years, and had mounted one-man shows in Rotterdam, Tokyo, Naples, Antwerp, London, Cologne, Milan, Basel and Munich, including a solo show of large steel sculptures at Leo Castelli’s gallery. Haring was committed to erasing the distinction between high and low art, but he tired of having his subway drawings “collected” almost as soon as they appeared, and he had been arrested several times making them. In 1986, he opened the Pop Shop on Lafayette Street which sold his art and products he designed. He said, “My shop is an extension of what I was doing in the subway stations, breaking down the barriers between high and low art.” While Basquiat may seem to have taken the high road, and Haring tried to navigate the tricky territory between major gallery artist and multiples entrepreneur, both artists were keen to have a broad audience and engage their generational peers. Basquiat gave up writing on the walls before Haring, probably because he sensed that what happened to black graffiti artist Michael Stewart, who died at the hands of the police, could easily happen to him. Haring produced events at Club 57 and curated the gallery space at the Mudd Club. He also created and distributed thousands of anti-nuke posters and designed fabric for designer Vivienne Westwood. He created dozens of indoor and outdoor murals; he created TV spots and stage sets for theater, film, video and dance. He painted a large mural for the Palladium nightclub. He collaborated with such diverse artists as Bill T. Jones, Robert Mapplethorpe, Brion Gysin, Jenny Holzer, Duran Duran and Run DMC. Basquiat made postcards and sold them on the street, hawked a line of hand-painted clothes under the name MANMADE, and created multiples, including the Anatomy series; he starred in the film Downtown 81, created an MTV video, illustrated a children’s book written by Maya Angelou and like Haring executed a large mural at the Palladium nightclub; he fronted his own band and produced a seminal hip-hop record. Basquiat DJ’d regularly at the nightclub Area where Haring also painted a skateboard ramp. Both artists were workaholics, creating in vastly diverse media virtually nonstop. Their lives were work. I don’t believe it had anything to do with ambition per se, or greed, or any kind of obsessive compulsive mental states, but with an almost magical desire to reclaim the power of the visual artist with the public. It’s no coincidence that both became close with the idol Andy Warhol, because he was another relentless worker who ranged seamlessly from painting, sculpture and prints, to film, video, theater and publishing, but also because Warhol seemed to want to make art itself bigger—to achieve the level of influence by the pop stars he knew like the Beatles and the Stones. It might have been expected that the 20-something artists sought out an artist old enough to be their father who came closer than any other Pop artist to making truly popular art. What wasn’t expected was that in the end Warhol would be more influenced by Haring and Basquiat than they were by him. The pupils became the master’s master. Warhol, a great draughtsman, had virtually given up drawing until Haring and Basquiat harangued and mocked him into once again showing his hand, which he did with spectacular results in his final bodies of work. Today, Haring and Basquiat are revered as masters and their work is highly coveted, but more than that they got what they really wanted: a mass public. They not only changed the art world, creating and opening for outsiders with vision; they changed the world’s consciousness across a spectrum—from sexual identity to black history. They made art that was educated and political but also stunningly captivating to the eye. They made art that was as big as rock, and they did it for the people, for the kids, and it’s still radiating decades later. From the Collection of a Private Bank
Keith Haring (1958-1990)

Self Portrait

成交價 美元 785,000
估價
美元 800,000 – 美元 1,200,000
拍品終止拍賣: 2014年11月13日
載入資料中
Keith Haring (1958-1990)

Self Portrait

成交價 美元 785,000
拍品終止拍賣: 2014年11月13日
成交價 美元 785,000
拍品終止拍賣: 2014年11月13日
  • 細明
  • 拍品專文
  • 相關文章
  • 更多來自
細節
Keith Haring (1958-1990)
Self Portrait
signed, numbered and dated 'K. Haring 1989 1/3' (on the base)
painted steel
144 x 91 x 117 in. (365.8 x 231.1 x 297.2 cm.)
Executed in 1989. This work is number one from an edition of three plus one artist's proof.
來源
André Emmerich Gallery, New York
Acquired from the above by the present owner, 1997
展覽
New York, André Emmerich Gallery, Keith Haring on Park Avenue: An Exhibition of the Public Art Fund, June-October 1997, pp. 16-17 (another example exhibited and illustrated).
Art Gallery of Hamilton Ontario, Irving Zucker Sculpture Garden (another example on view).

拍品專文

相關文章

Sorry, we are unable to display this content. Please check your connection.

雅逸精品專家指南

愛馬仕最受藏家歡迎的色彩指南

顏色是揭示愛馬仕包袋獨特韵味的重要元素。從3Q櫻花粉、10奶昔白,到37金棕色,佳士得專家爲您盤點愛馬仕歷史上令藏家趨之若鶩的美妙色彩

更多來自 戰後及當代藝術 (下午拍賣)

11 中的第 1 個
拍品 456
估價美元 200,000 – 美元 300,000
成交價美元 365,000
拍品 458

Jean-Michel Basquiat (1960-1988)

Untitled (Keith Haring)

估價美元 1,000,000 – 美元 1,500,000
成交價美元 1,025,000
拍品 459
估價美元 250,000 – 美元 350,000
成交價美元 341,000
拍品 460
估價美元 900,000 – 美元 1,200,000
成交價美元 905,000
拍品 461
估價美元 2,000,000 – 美元 3,000,000
成交價美元 2,045,000
拍品 462

Carroll Dunham (b. 1949)

Shape with Entrance

估價美元 150,000 – 美元 200,000
成交價美元 149,000
拍品 465

George Condo (b. 1957)

The Philosopher

估價美元 150,000 – 美元 200,000
成交價美元 185,000
拍品 466

Bruce Nauman (B.1941)

Double Poke in the Eye II

估價美元 180,000 – 美元 250,000
成交價美元 461,000
拍品 467

Bruce Nauman (b. 1941)

Template of the Left Half of My Body

估價美元 150,000 – 美元 250,000
成交價美元 149,000
拍品 469

Robert Mangold (b. 1937)

A Curved Line Within Two Distorted Rectangles (Orange)

估價美元 80,000 – 美元 120,000
成交價美元 137,000
拍品 470

Charles Ray (B. 1953)

All My Clothes

估價美元 150,000 – 美元 200,000
成交價美元 197,000