GEORGE ROMNEY, R.A. (DALTON-IN-FURNESS, LANCASHIRE 1734-1802 KENDAL, CUMBRIA)
GEORGE ROMNEY, R.A. (DALTON-IN-FURNESS, LANCASHIRE 1734-1802 KENDAL, CUMBRIA)
GEORGE ROMNEY, R.A. (DALTON-IN-FURNESS, LANCASHIRE 1734-1802 KENDAL, CUMBRIA)
2 更多
PROPERTY FROM THE COLLECTION OF MIMI ADLER
GEORGE ROMNEY, R.A. (DALTON-IN-FURNESS, LANCASHIRE 1734-1802 KENDAL, CUMBRIA)

Portrait of a lady, seated, three-quarter-length, in a landscape, traditionally identified as Anne, Countess of Clare (1766-1844)

细节
GEORGE ROMNEY, R.A. (DALTON-IN-FURNESS, LANCASHIRE 1734-1802 KENDAL, CUMBRIA)
Portrait of a lady, seated, three-quarter-length, in a landscape, traditionally identified as Anne, Countess of Clare (1766-1844)
oil on canvas
50 x 39 3⁄4 in (127 x 100.9 cm.)
来源
Richard Hobart FitzGibbon, 3rd Earl of Clare (1793-1864).
with Thomas Agnew & Sons, London, and from whom acquired in February 1889 by,
Frank Shuttleworth (1845-1913), Bedfordshire and London.
with Thomas Agnew & Sons, London.
with Lawrie & Co., London.
with Dowdeswell Galleries, London, 1899, from whom acquired by,
Sir John Blundell Maple, 1st Bt. (1845-1903), Dulwich.
James Orrock (1829-1913), London and Shepperton-on-Thames, Middlesex, and from whom acquired in 1901 by,
Senator William A. Clark (1839-1925), New York; his sale (†), American Art Association, New York, 11-12 January 1926, lot 98, where acquired by the following,
with Lewis & Simmons, London.
Leigh McMaster Battson (1891-1977), Beverly Hills; Sotheby’s, London, 27 June 1962, lot 99, where acquired by the following,
with Newhouse Galleries, New York.
Reginald N. Webster (1898-1983), Waltham, MA, and Palm Beach, FL; Sotheby Parke-Bernet, New York, 17 June 1982, lot 89, where acquired by the following,
with Newhouse Galleries, New York, where acquired by the late owner.
出版
G. Paston, George Romney, London, 1903, p. 192.
H. Ward and W. Roberts, Romney: Catalogue Raisonné of his Works, II, London, 1904, p. 30.
J. Watson, The Paintings of Emma Hart (Lady Hamilton) by George Romney: A Study of their Significance in Relation to his Historical Works, M.A. Thesis, 1974, p. 31.
N. Tscherny, ‘Persons and Property: Romney’s Society Portraiture,’ in Those Delightful Regions of Imagination: Essays on George Romney, A. Kidson, ed., New Haven and London, 2002, p. 53.
A. Kidson, George Romney: A Complete Catalogue of his Paintings, III, New Haven and London, 2015, pp. 738-739, no. 1632, illustrated.
展览
London, Grafton Galleries, Exhibition of a Second Selection from the Works by George Romney, 1900, no. 31.
拍场告示
Please note that Alex Kidson now believes this portrait dates to the early 1780s and depicts Elinor Grove, mother of John FitzGibbon, 1st Earl of Clare, rather than the traditional identification of her as the Earl’s wife, Anne. Elinor’s husband, John, passed away in 1780, which would explain why she is attired in mourning dress following the loss of her husband.

荣誉呈献

John Hawley
John Hawley Director, Head of Private Sales, EMEA

拍品专文

The sitter in this painting has traditionally been identified as Anne, Countess of Clare, on account of the painting’s early ownership by the younger of her two sons, Richard Hobart FitzGibbon, who inherited the Earldom of Clare upon the death of his elder brother, John FitzGibbon, 2nd Earl of Clare (1792-1851). In his recent catalogue raisonné, Alex Kidson (loc. cit.) notes that such an identification is anachronistic, since the painting is datable to the mid- to late 1780s, while Anne Whaley of Whaley Abbey, Co. Wicklow, Ireland, only became Countess of Clare upon the promotion of her husband, John FitzGibbon (1748-1802), to the Earldom of Clare in 1795. Provided the sitter is indeed Anne Whaley – who married FitzGibbon on 1 July 1786 at St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin, County Dublin, Ireland – its correct title would be either Miss Whaley or Mrs FitzGibbon.

Several factors inhibit definitive identification of the sitter. Romney’s sitter books and ledgers do not contain a reference to either a Miss Whaley or Mrs FitzGibbon. However, as Kidson notes (loc. cit.), Romney’s sitter book for 1785 is entirely missing, and it is possible that the portrait could have been carried out and entirely paid for in that year given its stylistic consistencies with such a dating. More problematic for the identification of the woman as Miss Whaley is the fact that the sitter wears black and it is unclear whether she was at that time in mourning. For these reasons, Kidson leaves open the possibility that the portrait depicts another woman altogether – possibly a mistress of John FitzGibbon – and that it was only subsequently misidentified as a portrait of the Countess.

更多来自 古典大师

查看全部
查看全部